Brighton and Hove Psychotherapy

Online Therapy
01273 921 355

by Leave a Comment

Popping a bluey – young men and Viagra

Following on from my earlier blog about the physiological effects of Viagra, in this blog I am going to discuss some of the psychological and social issues that make young men pop a blue pill.

There is common notion that young men are constantly getting erections and always up for having sex. Various sources indicate the reality is different. Peggy Orensteins’s recent book ‘Boys and Sex’ cites a General Social Survey study showing young men between 18 and 29 are having less sex. This is indicated by the increase in the number of men who declare themselves abstinent, which rose from 10% in 2008 to 28% in 2019.

Orensteins’s conversations with young men reveal the extent of their performance anxiety. They fear that girls would be more knowledgeable and experienced and in contrast they will be unsatisfactory sexual partners. They are anxious that any inadequacy, such as not being able to undo a bra strap or coming too quickly will be broadcast to their peer group on social media and result in humiliation. They are also concerned that girls will take it personally if they can’t get an erection. Young men seem to feel that they are responsible for the success of a sexual encounter.

At the same time online pornography has set up unrealistic expectations about opportunity, performance and satisfaction. The Reward Foundation is an educational charity that focuses on the internet, love, sex and relationships; they have found a correlation between erectile dysfunction in young men and an increase in access to internet porn. Whether or not young men actually believe that the sexual relationships and encounters they view on screen are ‘real’, these representations have an impact. As a young presenter on VICE online magazine said, “In my head I’m thinking that girls will be expecting me to fuck them like a porn star.”

First dates or sexual encounters can be extremely anxious events. Dating apps like Tinder and Grinder make it easy to move on to a new sexual partner if the sex does not meet expectations the first time. This may increase pressure on men to have a prolonged erection or several erections and Viagra can be an ‘insurance policy’ or a ‘booster shot’ to ensure a good performance the first time they have sex with a new partner. If the relationship continues they may continue to take Viagra to maintain their performance and hide the fact that they took it in the first place.

So what’s the problem with young men using Viagra to perform better? If young men believe that the standardised notion of good sex is a good performance as Orenstein’s study suggested, we can see that taking Viagra would be a way to avoid some of the stress about being a good performer. Unfortunately this can create a psychological dependency making it more and more difficult to stop taking Viagra and harder to open up the subject with a partner. Like any kind of emotional withholding keeping Viagra a secret is likely to be a negative factor in a sexual relationship.

Good sex can be whatever is good for each couple and is far more nuanced and complex than a good performance. In a relationship of mutual consent sex can bring physical and emotional intimacy but sex does not always go smoothly, misunderstandings and disappointments happen. Exploring sexual dissatisfaction and difficulties makes people feel extremely vulnerable. By using Viagra to focus on performance, young men are avoiding the opportunity to speak honestly about what they expect and want from sex as well as finding out what pleases their partners. Trusting each other and exploring differences and desires together can build a stronger relationship as well as a more satisfying sex life.

Angela Rogers is an Integrative Psychotherapeutic counsellor working with individuals and couples in Hove.

 

Further reading by Angela Rogers –

New Year’s Resolutions – Why change might be so difficult?

Viagra: Some ups and downs of the little blue pill

The Menopause – Women of a Certain Age

A couple state of mind

Men, Sex & Aging in Relationships

Facebooktwitter

by Leave a Comment

Relationships, networks and connections

How many of us are seldom more than an arms length from our mobile phone? Our bags, clothing, even our sports wear is designed with special pockets for its’ safe keeping. For most of us it has infiltrated every sphere of  life, a constant companion. Staying connected has never been so easy. Mobiles are for people (like us) on the move – always contactable – but never confined. As long as we are never too far from a power source and a signal we can bridge the gap between together and apart. It is a familiar modern experience to encounter, in a public space, a café, a bus, a pedestrian walkway, others, eyes down ensconced in their device. For many of us it feels jarring, not least because we know that we are not immune to the same behaviour. We no longer seek the eyes as a point of entry into the world of another.

Virtual proximity

Ours is a time when proximity no longer requires physical closeness just as physical closeness no longer determines proximity. Virtual proximity renders human connection simultaneously more frequent and more shallow, more intense and more brief. Getting in touch is no obstacle to staying apart. Notions of community have shifted with the tides of of socio political, economic and technological time. So too has our relationship to home. We now slip into our separate houses, more often our separate room’s bypassing the shared spaces, seeking ‘our own space’. The virtual ‘network’ is now the place we gather, the new village square, the new community, residing behind each closed door. We are lonelier than ever… more connected than ever.

Reflection

This is not a a condemnation of technology or technological innovation, how ignorant and foolish that would be. Rather it is an expression of concern about a gradual erosion of social and relational skills, of face to face, up front and personal human interaction. The more our attentions are absorbed in a virtual kind of proximity do we risk losing these skills ? Might we fail to learn them in the first place or reject them all together. Are we choosing to replace intimate proximal partnerships with virtual networks – and where may it lead us?

Quantity v quality

The language of ‘connections’ subtly usurps the language of ‘relationships’. Connections are ‘virtual relations’ entered and exited at the press of a button. In a virtual network connecting and disconnecting share the same status, are made on demand and broken at will. In a virtual network we are free to roam as we please and to terminate those connections which no longer interest or satisfy us. The old fashioned networks of ‘kinship’ and ‘partnership’ and ‘committed relationship’ are far more slow moving, clunky and messy than their virtual counterparts and certainly far more difficult to exit. Turnover is the cardinal measure of success in the consumer world. Consumer life favours lightness and speed. Variety and novelty are valued over durability. Commitment and sharing in this context lose their meaning and our appetites for interpersonal risk taking (relating) decline.

There is no doubt that in infinite ways technology improves and enhances our lives as individuals and communities. It is true too that wherever there is something gained there is inevitably something lost. So let us all remember to keep the bonds of human connection alive. Look up, make eye contact, maybe smile or say hello to the next person we stand next to in a queue or a lift. Face time for real! Let’s switch off our devices from time to time and not automatically grant them space at our tables when we commune with real life friends and family. And let’s leave them outside the bedroom door at the end of the day and reclaim that space for rest, restoration and good old human connection.

 

Gerry Gilmartin is an accredited, registered and experienced psychotherapeutic counsellor. She currently works with individuals (young people/adults) and couples in private practice. Gerry is available at our Brighton and Hove Practice.

 

Further reading by Gerry Gilmartin –

Paying attention to stress

Why does empathy matter?

What is Intimacy?

Love, commitment and desire in the age of choice

Facebooktwitter

by Leave a Comment

Home is in my Head: Rediscovering your Identity in a New Culture

The urge to migrate twists through the marrow of our bones; the restless energy moving our ancestors across vast wastelands in search of a better life mirrors our journey to self-actualisation.  With global migration on the rise what happens to your relationship to yourself and to others when  you leave your birth country for a different life? How do you fit yourself to a culture that is both exciting and un-lived and yet as closed as an unread book?

Years ago my mother an economic migrant and native french speaker, studied French A Level at my school together with my peers. Back then I didn’t understand and was embarrassed by her presence in the school corridors.  Now I see how courageous and important it was to navigate, and excel in, a world of English teenagers (she achieved Grade A).  Undoubtedly she struggled with her inner voice that continues to taunt ‘you are a guest in this country’.  How much I ingested of her shame I can’t say. It is impossible to separate the hidden toxicity of shame from my identity – the me who lives, breathes and continually adapts to the pull of three different cultures: my parents’ and the British culture I was born into.

Whether through choice or forced migration the traumatic consequences of relocation can include rootlessness, alienation, difficulties in relating to others and disconnection to yourself – it requires emotional investment to redefine yourself in an alien culture, to start to fit in, to feel a sense of belonging.  Dislocation leads to a sense of disease, of being ill at ease with the person you thought you were, without a clear sense of yourself in relation to others. Says Gestalt theorist Yontef (1993)  ‘Living that is not based on the truth of oneself leads to feelings of dread, guilt and anxiety’.

You might ask who am I in this new place I inhabit, how do I move, talk, occupy this alien environment? Whose space is it? Am I allowed in? Will the other give up some of their space for me in the territorial dance between us?

“I can’t stay in one place, my home is in my head”* state A-wa, an Israeli pop group who sing in Yemeni as an homage to their grandparents.  This sentiment is felt as a spiritual and physical load, the burden of those who carry the heart and soul of their homeland with them wherever they go.

I hold inside me poignant stories of others’ longings for a secure base: the European man who seeks love looks for a woman who understands the food he used to eat at his mother’s table.  The woman whose future lies in repeated migrations – whose only home is her partner.

Perhaps a way to reorient yourself to a new country is in finding allies in people from your own culture or embracing your partner’s family. In the therapy room you may want to explore finding a way back to yourself, the you who hasn’t stood still but hasn’t yet found a way to fit in.  Therapy can support you to restore the sense of who you are, what you want to say, what you want to ask for.

By rooting yourself in your own identity, you can re-build self esteem and ultimately risk new and exciting relationships in the world around you – your colleagues, peers, future friends and family.

 

Resources: 

*  A-wa, (2019) from the album Bayti Fi Rasi

Yontef, G (1993) Awareness, Dialogue & Process: Essays on Gestalt Therapy. Highland. N.Y: The Gestalt Journal Press

 

Suzanne Worrica is an experienced psychotherapist who works with individuals and couples. She is available at our Lewes Practice.

 

Further reading by Suzanne Worrica –

Emotionally Focused Therapy: For Couples in Distress

Facebooktwitter

by Leave a Comment

How being ordinary is increasingly extraordinary – On the role of narcissistic defences

Who wants to be ordinary? The word has unpleasant connotations; like something that offers little that is good or substantial. And yet it is a word I often think about and return to in my clinical practice. It could even be one of the primary goals of therapy: to become ordinary.

In the world today there is more and more in place to protect us from being ordinary, that is, to protect us from being ourselves.

We have an almost infinite number of television channels, live streaming of every conceivable film and box-set and console games set in technicolour virtual reality.  The whole world is modelled on making us all feel special. And it is within reach for us all, if only we have just enough about us to win the latest talent show broadcast at primetime, or to garner enough Youtube followers or win the Lotto – after all ‘it could be you’.

All this presupposes that being simply ordinary is wrong; that being ordinary is settling for something less than. However, being ordinary in the truest sense of the world means being able to be in relationship with our inner world and make decisions and life choices – choices based on desire rather than the need to shore up our defences.

What is ordinary?

If being ordinary has little to do with accepting the mundane or second-rate life, then what does it mean?  Being ordinary means being in the real world, rather than retreating to a ‘fantasy world’ each time the real world becomes uncomfortable.  Or in some cases retreating from the real world to avoid it even the anticipation of discomfort.

On defences

I have previously written about manic defences enlisted in order to protect us from discomfort.  And whilst this blog in essence remains about manic defences, the use of certain defences to avoid ordinariness and strive for the extraordinary are a particular subset in the cluster of manic defences known as narcissistic defences.

Neglected children always construct a story of specialness

Whether it is story of being ‘special’ to a parent who leans on them for emotional support, or it is specialness born out of surviving a difficult childhood, being special or extraordinary can be a short-term invaluable solution to feeling helpless, hopeless, enraged and depressed. Or even mad.

Being extraordinary shores up the empty core of the neglected and abused child.  It enables them to cope and to construct a ‘pseudo-self’ so they can navigate the world. At least for a while.

A special kind of defence

There is an argument that as a society (western), we are becoming increasingly narcissistic: focused on consumerism and fantasy rather than connection and relationship.

The consumer world makes it easy to ‘sell’ specialness or the attainability of extraordinariness.  Even in the western spiritual model specialness is promoted through maxims such as ‘you are unique’; ‘you have a special gift to offer the world’ and so forth.

What’s so bad about being extraordinary?

Life should not be a choice between being extraordinary or being nothing (feeling like one does not exist).  Being ordinary is not the contrary of being extraordinary, at least not in psychotherapy. Being ordinary is the third position.

Being ordinary is a mature position of being able to withstand and navigate real life without flights of fancy; it is a position whereby we can make decisions from a position of strength and desire rather than from an ongoing defence of the fragile self.

In tangible terms, being ordinary means living a real and fulfilling life without a constant need for external validation and approval.  Without being defined by Facebook or Instagram ‘likes’.

Being ordinary is an authentic position and one through which we may have extraordinary experiences if we are lucky, but they will be rooted in reality.

All in all, it seems to me that being ordinary has really become something extraordinary in the modern world.

 

Mark Vahrmeyer, UKCP Registered, BHP Co-founder is an integrative psychotherapist with a wide range of clinical experience from both the public and private sectors. He currently sees both individuals and couples, primarily for ongoing psychotherapy.  Mark is available at the Lewes and Brighton & Hove Practices.

 

Further reading by Mark Vahrmeyer –

Can Psychotherapy or counselling be a business expense?

The difference between Counselling and Psychotherapy

What is the difference between fate and destiny?

Facebooktwitter

by Leave a Comment

Family Therapy for Beginners

Professor Richard Layard, one time ‘Happiness Tsar’, wrote, ‘in every study, family relationships, (and our close private life) are more important than any other single factor in affecting our happiness’.

It’s hard to grow and feel safe and content in the world if our family stories are causing us distress and discomfort. This is especially true for children, and young people when their family is their world. When they are struggling with emotional and behavioural problems or maybe unexplained physical ailments a ‘systemic’ approach can be revealing.

Systemic therapy is relational, that means looking at the spaces in between people and their relationships with others, as opposed to looking inside individuals. Systemic therapists are interested in the ‘systems’ that people belong to, such as our families, school, work places, peers and friendships. Exploring the context of tension, distress and unhappiness can help us illuminate the possible causes.

For example we may find stories of divorce and separation, estrangement, sibling rivalry, family illness and disability, bullying, academic struggles, financial problems, loss and bereavement, or drug and alcohol use Family therapy is about having conversations that can be difficult, exposing, controversial, and upsetting.

But also about reconnecting, understanding, sharing and being surprised. Feeling heard, understood, loved and believed. Explaining your side of a story, hearing family stories that help you understand current struggles and appreciating other people’s point of view. Feeling proud and united, relieved and supported and wondering together how you can move on.

Any therapy involves taking a risk; family therapy provides an invitation to be brave and accept that families may be worried, sad or confused about someone they love. Or maybe family relationships are feeling tense and strained, or they are missing someone who played an important role in your lives.

Established, repaired and revisited relationships give families a rich resource for healing.  Family Therapy sessions usually last 90 minutes, and as many family members who are available are welcome.  Work would begin by exploring why it had been decided now was the time for family talking and noting individual and family goals to help focus the work. Some family members may be initially reluctant to attend, its important for them to be aware that just be attending they are showing their support. They do not have to contribute verbally if they do not want to – this could be agreed at the beginning of the session. By just turning up they are able to listen to other expressing their views and will usually join in when they feel comfortable and safe within the process.

A genogram or family tree is usually constructed looking at the current family structure and remembering older generations. This provides a map of the family and a cultural context for the current problems. It generates stories, sometimes forgotten, about how positive and negative patterns and traits may have been inherited by the family in the room. This can be a revealing and emotional, with younger people hearing about relations that may have died before they were born and older ones remembering stories that help build to a clearer understanding of the family’s identity. A time-line constructing a chronology of family births and deaths and other family events is also useful. Again, this begins reveals its own narrative, which can help a family begin to plot the life story of a problem.

Family Therapy is always driven by the goals of the family and continual feedback allows the therapist to ensure that the family are having the conversations they want and need to have. Sometimes it may feel useful for family members to meet individually, in couples or sibling groups as part of the therapy.

It is not necessary to meet weekly; sometimes families find one or two sessions are enough to feel they are able to move forward. In my experience family therapy can be a powerful process with the family leaving more connected with and appreciative of each other.

Sharon Spindler is an experienced Systemic Family Therapist with twelve years experience within the NHS and private practice.  Sharon is available at the Brighton & Hove Practice.

 

Facebooktwitter

Copyright © 2020 – Brighton And Hove Psychotherapy – Privacy Policy
6 The Drive, Hove , East Sussex, BN3 3JA.